Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged. Others believe that children who are taught to co-operate rather than compete become more useful adults.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There has always been a consensus over the issue that the competitive spirit is more pivotal to the future career of a child than the team skills. However, some argue that both mentioned methods should be fostered equally to gain fruitful success.
On the one hand, children who are taught to obtain a strong desire in competition appeal to have myriad benefits and drawbacks. Firstly, they are capable of working independently. This skill is especially precise in the case when a job requires working separately for secret purposes like in politics. An individual must decide whether or not to share information. However, an extremely strong sense of competition could prone to harm them due to their subjective decisions. Should a person solely consider his choice and omit or underestimate other suggestions, he may lose many precious opportunities.
On the other hand, however, co-operating skills are worth being incubated in every child. Successfully maintaining this skill means that an individual can take good use of others’ merits. There is no exaggeration to say that people obtaining team spirit are easier to progress in their career. This is mostly because they know how to manage the workforce and solve the problems more practically.
Moreover, those may tend to be nominated to work as leaders.
All in all, competitive spirit, as well as team spirit have their own beneficial perspectives in the development of a child and are required for specific jobs. Consequently, it is hard for me to draw a line between the importance of these two skills and it is hard to for a child to just having a singular one for their substantial occupation. (274)
