Topic -Some people believe that exams are an inappropriate way of measuring students' performance and should be replaced by continuous assessment. Do you agree or disagree with this view?
Answer - exam consider as a measuring tool of student performance.It dos not mean who do not score well ,will be the same in next semester.from my point of view, assessment would be the way keep notice students aptitude and exam also important.
Student has different way of study. Some memorise and scour well and some would like to study deeply. Another factor is area of interest. We can not judge only the basis of exam.Pupil has different grasping power,some are creative and some are intelligent.exam are inappropriate because often student cheats in the exam and got good score ,it's not fair enough cheater equivalent to hard worker
Assessment help overall student to perform good at exam in that case student should response well, Teacher keep track of all the student,regular assist in weak subject but it dose not replace by the exam. Exam help in future career to tackle the pressurise situation.
To sum up, my point of view, only exam not right way to evaluate pupils performance, it dose not means replace by assessment. Assessment also another way of development. Mixe of both would be the appropriate way.
How I can improve my writing
Re: How I can improve my writing
brijesh wrote:Topic -Some people believe that exams are an inappropriate way of measuring students' performance and should be replaced by continuous assessment. Do you agree or disagree with this view?
Answer - Exams are used as a measuring tool of student performance. It does not mean that those who do not score well will be the same in next semester. (<--I don't understand what you mean.) From my point of view, continuous assessment would be the way to measure student aptitude. However, exams are also important.
Students have different ways of studying. Some memorise and scour well and some would like to study deeply.(<--I don't understand what you mean.) Another factor is area of interest. We can not judge ability solely based on exam score. Pupils learn things at different speeds. Some are creative and some are intelligentExams are inappropriate because often students cheat to get a good score, which isn't fair to the students who study hard.
Continuous assessment help overall student to perform good at exam in that case student should response well, Teacher keep track of all the student,regular assist in weak subject but it dose not replace by the exam.(<--I don't understand this sentence. It is too long. It doesn't make sense.) Exams help students learn how to deal with pressure situations.
To sum up, in my opinion, only using exams is not the right way to evaluate pupils' performance. This does not meanit should be completely replaced by continuous assessment. Continuous assessment is another way to measure development. A mix of both would be the most appropriate way.