Please give some feedback.

[Wave]

Many old buildings are protected by law because they are part of a nation's history. However, some people think old buildings should be knocked down to make way for new ones because people need houses and offices.
How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of process?

Governments have been preserving historical buildings for quite sometime now. They tell us so much about history. However, demolishing old buildings in order to make way for new houses and offices is a concept that I partially believe is quite essential in today's world we live in. The importance of constructing new buildings instead of old historical ones and a drawback to pulling down those historical buildings will be analyzed in this essay.
One of the key merits ofnew buildings being constructed in the place of old historical ones is a great way to deal with problems of today's overpopulated cities. For instance, Tokyo has seen a number of towering apartment complexes and business premises which resolved its people's needs for such constructions. Overall, this has helped reshape the city's infrastructureh while sacrificing its archaic buildings to satisfy its population's need. This sacrifice playes an important role in supporting arguments that arise over building instead of old ones.
On the other hand, historical buildings are mere attractions to foreign tourists who bring a large amount of money into a country's economic. The pyramids in Egypt annually visited by millions of people from all around the world can be an example. Besides, being a money-driving source, those types of buildings speak for our ancestors and history they left behind. Thus, the plausibility of this argument is clear.
In summary, both arguments can be supported with so many realistic examples. However, I strongly believe historical sites should be preserved, not standing in the progress of city development.

[Flick]

Many old buildings are protected by law because they are part of a nation's history. However, some people think old buildings should be knocked down to make way for new ones because people need houses and offices.
How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of process?

Governments have been preserving historical buildings for quite some time now. They tell us so much about history. However, demolishing old buildings in order to make way for new houses and offices is a concept that I partially believe is quite essential in today's world. The importance of constructing new buildings instead of keeping old historical ones, and the drawbacks of pulling down those historical buildings will be analyzed in this essay.

One of the key merits of new buildings being constructed in the place of old historical ones is it is a great way to deal with the problem of today's overpopulated cities. For instance, Tokyo has built a number of towering apartment complexes and business premises which resolved its people's needs for such constructions. Overall, this has helped reshape the city's infrastructure while sacrificing its archaic buildings to satisfy its population's need. This sacrifice plays an important role in supporting arguments that arise over building new structures instead of keeping old ones.

On the other hand, historical buildings are attractions to foreign tourists who bring a large amount of money into a country's economy. For example, the pyramids in Egypt are annually visited by millions of people from all around the world. Besides being a source of profit, those types of buildings speak for our ancestors and our history. Thus, the plausibility of this argument is clear.

In summary, both arguments can be supported with many realistic examples. However, I strongly believe that historical sites should be preserved, as long as they don't stand in the way of a city's development.