Some people prefer to do the same job in the same place, but others prefer to change jobs frequently. You should use specific reasons to compare the advantages and disadvantages of both sides.
People hold different opinions as to whether or not individuals should work in various types of jobs throughout their lives. Although there are advantages of having multiple careers, I would argue that sticking with one career path is better for a person’s development.
Admittedly, the modern society setting favours those who have a wide range of knowledge across many occupational disciplines. Many popular vocations such as engineers and retailers require employees to have several set of skills in order for them to work competently in these positions. Therefore, those who have worked in the fields of engineering as well as having gained experiences with the retail industry would be more attractive to prospective employers than people who have confined themselves to one industry. Also, pursuing several professions in different areas would render people with a broad view of life because they have to constantly adapt to changes and cope with challenges in their lives.
However, I believe that changing jobs frequently with a view to expanding one’s horizons is not always advantageous. More specifically, people having multiple careers are rather restricted in terms of becoming proficient in one particular area. It is often the case that an individual who is unable to stay in one vocation for a long time fails to secure a job within the same industry due to this person’s lack of specialised skills, regardless of how many jobs this person has worked in. On the other hand, being able to stick with a career for a considerably long period would equip an employee with advanced abilities to become extremely skilful in one specific field. Despite that performing monotonous tasks would result in a sense of boring, the consciousness of security and the fulfilment deriving from being professional in certain areas are rather beneficial to the well-being of employees, especially those who prefer a stable life. In addition, the high salary and bonus which are often offered to loyal workers would make them feel satisfied, which helps them to lead a happy life. These are advantages that cannot be provided by having several careers where constant changing makes it easy for anyone to experience an insecure life.
In conclusion, it seems to me that having a stable career is more advantageous than repeatedly altering one’s career path. Thus, I would propose that it is better for people to devote the bulk of their time to fostering professionalism within one field.
Topic of changing jobs
Re: Topic of changing jobs
yhjsaber wrote:Some people prefer to do the same job in the same place, but others prefer to change jobs frequently. You should use specific reasons to compare the advantages and disadvantages of both sides.
People hold different opinions as to whether or not individuals should work in various types of jobs throughout their lives. Although there are advantages of having multiple careers, I would argue that sticking with one career path is better for a person’s development.
Admittedly, modern society favours those who have a wide range of knowledge across many occupational disciplines. Many popular vocations, such as engineers and retailers, require employees to have several sets of skills in order for them to work competently in these positions. Therefore, those who have worked in the fields of engineering as well as having gained experiences within the retail industry would be more attractive to prospective employers than people who have confined themselves to one industry. Also, pursuing several professions in different areas would render people with a broad view of life because they have to constantly adapt to changes and cope with challenges in their lives.
However, I believe that changing jobs frequently with a view to expanding one’s horizons is not always advantageous. More specifically, people having multiple careers are rather restricted in terms of becoming proficient in one particular area. It is often the case that an individual who is unable to stay in one vocation for a long time fails to secure a job within the same industry due to this person’s lack of specialised skills, regardless of how many jobs this person has worked in. On the other hand, being able to stick with a career for a considerably long period would equip an employee with advanced abilities to become extremely skilful in one specific field. Despite that performing monotonous tasks would result in a sense of boredom, the consciousness of security and the fulfilment deriving from being professional in certain areas are rather beneficial to the well-being of employees, especially those who prefer a stable life. In addition, the high salary and bonus which are often offered to loyal workers would make them feel satisfied, which helps them to lead a happy life. These are advantages that cannot be provided by having several careers where constant changing makes it likely for anyone to experience an insecure life.
In conclusion, it seems to me that having a stable career is more advantageous than repeatedly altering one’s career path. Thus, I would propose that it is better for people to devote the bulk of their time to fostering professionalism within one field.
Well argued and logical reasoning. Great work!