Aiming at 7.5 above. Please help to assess as i plan to take the test in 2 weeks time. Thanks!
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 7:46 am
Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
In recent years, as globalisation improves trades around the world, people can now purchase the same products freely. Such development raises a debate that whether it is a positive trend or not. This paper will articulate both sides before came into a conclusion.
Undoubtedly, having the opportunity to buy any items we want without have to worry where to buy is one great relief to most shoppers. The convenient gives shoppers an equal chance of shopping and that they do not have to travel abroad to buy their dreams products. For instance, anyone whose affordable can buy luxurious items like Gucci bags in their own countries. This has then help people save their travel time and money effectively.
In addition to this, one great merit of wide availability is that it supports the sellers and organisations in gaining higher profit. This means a country’s economy would also be developed and improved accordingly when the purchase’s demand and supply are both increased.
However, such development might also cause generalisation of one brand that is originally unique and special. There are certain products that created solely to a specific group of buyers. Take Louise Vuitton as an example, although this brand is considerably high-end, it is slowly losing its uniqueness and its place as a luxurious brand because its products can be found in most nations. This also means that buying from Malaysia or Vietnam has the same shopping experience as in Italy. Eventually, these products will drop from its desired standard in long run.
In sum, generalisation and high availability of a product will only negatively affect minority. Whereas, positively, most levels of stakeholders, namely medium to low income groups, organisations, and even the nations are all benefits from it.
In recent years, as globalisation improves trades around the world, people can now purchase the same products freely. Such development raises a debate that whether it is a positive trend or not. This paper will articulate both sides before came into a conclusion.
Undoubtedly, having the opportunity to buy any items we want without have to worry where to buy is one great relief to most shoppers. The convenient gives shoppers an equal chance of shopping and that they do not have to travel abroad to buy their dreams products. For instance, anyone whose affordable can buy luxurious items like Gucci bags in their own countries. This has then help people save their travel time and money effectively.
In addition to this, one great merit of wide availability is that it supports the sellers and organisations in gaining higher profit. This means a country’s economy would also be developed and improved accordingly when the purchase’s demand and supply are both increased.
However, such development might also cause generalisation of one brand that is originally unique and special. There are certain products that created solely to a specific group of buyers. Take Louise Vuitton as an example, although this brand is considerably high-end, it is slowly losing its uniqueness and its place as a luxurious brand because its products can be found in most nations. This also means that buying from Malaysia or Vietnam has the same shopping experience as in Italy. Eventually, these products will drop from its desired standard in long run.
In sum, generalisation and high availability of a product will only negatively affect minority. Whereas, positively, most levels of stakeholders, namely medium to low income groups, organisations, and even the nations are all benefits from it.