Kindly assess my writing. Thankyou
Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2016 6:56 pm
Some people think it is better to give donations to local charitable organizations,
while others choose to give to national or international bodies. Discuss both views
and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example from your own knowledge or experience.
In the contemporary society different charity run institutions are playing cardinal role in ameliorating problems, faced by different facets of societies. Many commentators opine that it is comparatively more prudent to support local organizations, while other analysts assert that national and international institutions are more reliable in term of understanding and solving populace problems. I strongly agree with later approach.
Firstly, renowned national and international charitable organizations have a systematic way of disbursing funds, that they collect from people, and also they are more reliable and trust worthy as far as monetary matters are concerned, especially because of their strict and crystal clear policies. In U.S.A, for instance organizations like helping hand collect millions of dollars from masses and subsequently use this amount frugally on most pressing issues to amend the suffering of people in different poverty stricken African nations. Thus, in this light, it is understandable why people trust these organizations with their donations.
On the other hand, some people assert that local bodies have more clear insight about different problems faced by communities and also proponents opine that it is logical to support organizations which are working to rectify the problems of local impoverished families instead of people from some other parts of world . For instance, Edhi foundation in Pakistan, receives a copious amount of charity from populace every year, because of its commendable contribution towards serving locals. So, it can be inferred from aforementioned arguments that these local organizations are also playing their part to alleviate the different crisis faced by people.
To recapitulate, although there are arguments on both sides, I am in accord with the verdict that the merits of funding national and international institutions clearly outweigh the local bodies.
while others choose to give to national or international bodies. Discuss both views
and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example from your own knowledge or experience.
In the contemporary society different charity run institutions are playing cardinal role in ameliorating problems, faced by different facets of societies. Many commentators opine that it is comparatively more prudent to support local organizations, while other analysts assert that national and international institutions are more reliable in term of understanding and solving populace problems. I strongly agree with later approach.
Firstly, renowned national and international charitable organizations have a systematic way of disbursing funds, that they collect from people, and also they are more reliable and trust worthy as far as monetary matters are concerned, especially because of their strict and crystal clear policies. In U.S.A, for instance organizations like helping hand collect millions of dollars from masses and subsequently use this amount frugally on most pressing issues to amend the suffering of people in different poverty stricken African nations. Thus, in this light, it is understandable why people trust these organizations with their donations.
On the other hand, some people assert that local bodies have more clear insight about different problems faced by communities and also proponents opine that it is logical to support organizations which are working to rectify the problems of local impoverished families instead of people from some other parts of world . For instance, Edhi foundation in Pakistan, receives a copious amount of charity from populace every year, because of its commendable contribution towards serving locals. So, it can be inferred from aforementioned arguments that these local organizations are also playing their part to alleviate the different crisis faced by people.
To recapitulate, although there are arguments on both sides, I am in accord with the verdict that the merits of funding national and international institutions clearly outweigh the local bodies.