IELTS task 2... please validate
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2016 6:27 pm
Some employers offer their employees subsidized membership of gyms and sports clubs,
believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work. Other employers
see no benefit in doing so. Consider the arguments from both aspects of this possible debate, and reach a conclusion.
Many believe that companies are always seeking to enhance the productivity of their employees’ by subsidizing recreational activities such gym and other sports facilities. However, others believe that these facilities are waste of time and money and hence, should be avoided at workplace. Both the points are described below:
On the one hand, it is said that if employees are fit and healthy then their working time will be more effective, leading to higher levels output and service. Furthermore, work-life balance will be improved because they have more time to spend on leisure activities with their families. Moreover, they can use these activities to reduce the stress levels. Jobs are very demanding nowadays, for example, one has to work very hard to fulfill the requirements and if they get some free time to do such activities then they may even be more motivating and thus feeling healthy may further lead to job satisfaction which is considered superior than any other financial rewards.
Conversely, the main problem with such leisure-based subsidies is that their efficacy cannot be tracked. For example, with target-related jobs, employers can see whether the objectives are reached or not and if the purpose are not met then companies may initiate the modification in programs. Some people think that if we spend budget on training or time management which can help employees in day to day tasks. Moreover, these matters are easy to measure especially in performance review or appraisals and can help organization to enchase their revenues.
To conclude, it seems that health-related subsidies can help individuals to stay fit and stress free but the lack of measurability is one major drawback. Spending funding on ongoing training would be better option for company to spend budget on.
believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work. Other employers
see no benefit in doing so. Consider the arguments from both aspects of this possible debate, and reach a conclusion.
Many believe that companies are always seeking to enhance the productivity of their employees’ by subsidizing recreational activities such gym and other sports facilities. However, others believe that these facilities are waste of time and money and hence, should be avoided at workplace. Both the points are described below:
On the one hand, it is said that if employees are fit and healthy then their working time will be more effective, leading to higher levels output and service. Furthermore, work-life balance will be improved because they have more time to spend on leisure activities with their families. Moreover, they can use these activities to reduce the stress levels. Jobs are very demanding nowadays, for example, one has to work very hard to fulfill the requirements and if they get some free time to do such activities then they may even be more motivating and thus feeling healthy may further lead to job satisfaction which is considered superior than any other financial rewards.
Conversely, the main problem with such leisure-based subsidies is that their efficacy cannot be tracked. For example, with target-related jobs, employers can see whether the objectives are reached or not and if the purpose are not met then companies may initiate the modification in programs. Some people think that if we spend budget on training or time management which can help employees in day to day tasks. Moreover, these matters are easy to measure especially in performance review or appraisals and can help organization to enchase their revenues.
To conclude, it seems that health-related subsidies can help individuals to stay fit and stress free but the lack of measurability is one major drawback. Spending funding on ongoing training would be better option for company to spend budget on.