AnotherT1
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2016 10:21 am
The given table demonstrates information as regards percentage of various Australian family types living in poverty in 1999.
Overall, what stands out from the table is that solo parents was the most popular poor family category, nonetheless, the least popular one was aged couples.
To begin with single aged person straightly 6% of them lived not wealthy which meant 54 000 of Australian single aged citizens. Couple with no children hit slightly lesser number than single aged person 7% in percentage but considerably more in number (211 000 people).
Another poor family type was solo parents, whose proportion accounted for 21%, which meant 211 000 Australians. Even though, single with no children families’ proportion was 19% their quantity was the second most popular after couple with children who accounted for 12% with 933 000 people. However, only 4% of aged couples lived in poverty which meant 54 000 people. All in all, all households living in poverty in Australia was 11% with 1 837 000 inhabitants.
Overall, what stands out from the table is that solo parents was the most popular poor family category, nonetheless, the least popular one was aged couples.
To begin with single aged person straightly 6% of them lived not wealthy which meant 54 000 of Australian single aged citizens. Couple with no children hit slightly lesser number than single aged person 7% in percentage but considerably more in number (211 000 people).
Another poor family type was solo parents, whose proportion accounted for 21%, which meant 211 000 Australians. Even though, single with no children families’ proportion was 19% their quantity was the second most popular after couple with children who accounted for 12% with 933 000 people. However, only 4% of aged couples lived in poverty which meant 54 000 people. All in all, all households living in poverty in Australia was 11% with 1 837 000 inhabitants.