Please assess my writing task 2
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2016 11:14 pm
In some countries children have very strict rules of behaviour, in other countries they are allowed to do almost anything they want. What extent children have to follow rules.
Children are most fragile component of any society and their proper brought up is quite challenging in many domains. In many countries, for this purpose various behavioural code of conducts are specially formulated and the principle objective of all these rules is to produce the best out of them. But like many others , this theory is also supported by some and rejected by others. In my opinion, freedom of conduct is right of every individual child but the importance of monitoring and supervision can't be denied aswell.
To begin with, it is acceptable that excessive and vigilant strictness can act as potential mental stressors. Due to this most of the kids will behave stubborn, inattentive and ignorant. Consequently, some might consider their environment hostile for themselves. For instance, it is the reason that in many countries abusing and beating children is completely prohibited. As a matter of fact, this is particularly for child protection and their liberal acts.
However, now the question arises that if kids are given full authority then how will they become excellent beings? The answers for this question can be many. Firstly, kindness and love are considered as natural substitutes of severe and stern rules. Secondly, guiding children in a way that they don't feel controlled and operated is also functional. Honestly, my sister manipulates her three years old kid by explaining the results of his every action to fullest and as an outcome the bonding between them is exemplary.
To conclude, it is surely not important, neither necessary that children have to be a part of behavioural projects, if they meant to be naive and good in future. In fact, freedom and soft surveillance of their cute actions can do so. Moreover, the creation of this personal space will help them to outshine as grown up adults.
Children are most fragile component of any society and their proper brought up is quite challenging in many domains. In many countries, for this purpose various behavioural code of conducts are specially formulated and the principle objective of all these rules is to produce the best out of them. But like many others , this theory is also supported by some and rejected by others. In my opinion, freedom of conduct is right of every individual child but the importance of monitoring and supervision can't be denied aswell.
To begin with, it is acceptable that excessive and vigilant strictness can act as potential mental stressors. Due to this most of the kids will behave stubborn, inattentive and ignorant. Consequently, some might consider their environment hostile for themselves. For instance, it is the reason that in many countries abusing and beating children is completely prohibited. As a matter of fact, this is particularly for child protection and their liberal acts.
However, now the question arises that if kids are given full authority then how will they become excellent beings? The answers for this question can be many. Firstly, kindness and love are considered as natural substitutes of severe and stern rules. Secondly, guiding children in a way that they don't feel controlled and operated is also functional. Honestly, my sister manipulates her three years old kid by explaining the results of his every action to fullest and as an outcome the bonding between them is exemplary.
To conclude, it is surely not important, neither necessary that children have to be a part of behavioural projects, if they meant to be naive and good in future. In fact, freedom and soft surveillance of their cute actions can do so. Moreover, the creation of this personal space will help them to outshine as grown up adults.