task2 essay please evaluate my essay aim band 7
Posted: Sat Apr 15, 2017 10:03 pm
SOME PEOPLE SAY THAT GOVERNOMENT NEED TO DO MORE TO PREVENT DAMAGE TO THE ENVIRONMENT .
TO WHAT eXTENT DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE WITHTHIS STATEMENT?
it is argued that authorities should be more involved in the protection of the environment from damage. This essay agrees with this statement because governments are obligated to protect the natural resources in the country and to enforce sufficient environment protection laws. This will be analyzed in details to reach a reasonable conclusion.
There is no aim in denying that authorities have moral commitments to protect different natural resources for the coming generations. When major projects are planned all regulations and opinions of the local community should be considered to protect the environment. For example, several industrial projects near the cost of the red sea are cancelled by the ministry of environment to protect the coral reefs from damage by pollution. Because coral reefs may need hundreds of years to recover after destruction.
Additionally, governments have the ability to impose laws and regulations to hinder environmental damage. Different sentences from fines to imprisonment should be used against individuals who cause destruction to the natural resources. This may act as a deterrent to prevent people from damaging the environment. This extends from the simple actions which are harmful to the natural resources to the major intended environmental crimes. For example, in Netherland local authorities in the city of Amsterdam impose 150 euro fine for individuals who throw papers on the streets, so the streets are clean all the time.
In conclusion, once again I state my opinion that, authorities should contribute more for prevention of environmental damage due to moral commitment towards next generations and the ability they have by the power of law.
TO WHAT eXTENT DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE WITHTHIS STATEMENT?
it is argued that authorities should be more involved in the protection of the environment from damage. This essay agrees with this statement because governments are obligated to protect the natural resources in the country and to enforce sufficient environment protection laws. This will be analyzed in details to reach a reasonable conclusion.
There is no aim in denying that authorities have moral commitments to protect different natural resources for the coming generations. When major projects are planned all regulations and opinions of the local community should be considered to protect the environment. For example, several industrial projects near the cost of the red sea are cancelled by the ministry of environment to protect the coral reefs from damage by pollution. Because coral reefs may need hundreds of years to recover after destruction.
Additionally, governments have the ability to impose laws and regulations to hinder environmental damage. Different sentences from fines to imprisonment should be used against individuals who cause destruction to the natural resources. This may act as a deterrent to prevent people from damaging the environment. This extends from the simple actions which are harmful to the natural resources to the major intended environmental crimes. For example, in Netherland local authorities in the city of Amsterdam impose 150 euro fine for individuals who throw papers on the streets, so the streets are clean all the time.
In conclusion, once again I state my opinion that, authorities should contribute more for prevention of environmental damage due to moral commitment towards next generations and the ability they have by the power of law.