task 2 <preserve languages>
Posted: Wed May 21, 2014 8:00 am
Some people believe that governments should protect the lesser-known languages, but others believe this is a waste of money. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Over the last decade, investing money to protect less popular languages has significantly increased the world over. While some opine that these are of a complete waste of money, others believe that the government should preserve less spoken languages. This essay is an attempt to analyze both sides before arriving at a satisfactory outcome.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why people argue that the government should not spend money on saving less popular languages. The main reason is that there are other essential areas need big investments such as food, shelter and employment. For example, in Africa, many individuals are affected by hunger, disease and poverty. When people are dying without proper food, investing money to protect infamous languages cannot be justified. Thus, it is clear why some people have this opinion.
On the other hand, many believe that the government should preserve less known languages. The reason is that it is possible for these languages have important and useful information to humans. For instance, Sanskrit, one of the languages spoken only by a small group of people in South India, is dramatically disappearing in recent days. This has many typical lessons and notes on how to cure kidney and sinus problems. If this language disappears, these medicinal methods would disappear. So for this reason, many argue that lesser spoken languages should be preserved at any cost.
To sum up, arguments whether to invest money or not to protect less popular languages have strong support. In my opinion, governments have to find a viable way to protect all languages by investing less money. Let us hope that people, in the future, would enjoy all different languages which are useful to mankind.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Over the last decade, investing money to protect less popular languages has significantly increased the world over. While some opine that these are of a complete waste of money, others believe that the government should preserve less spoken languages. This essay is an attempt to analyze both sides before arriving at a satisfactory outcome.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why people argue that the government should not spend money on saving less popular languages. The main reason is that there are other essential areas need big investments such as food, shelter and employment. For example, in Africa, many individuals are affected by hunger, disease and poverty. When people are dying without proper food, investing money to protect infamous languages cannot be justified. Thus, it is clear why some people have this opinion.
On the other hand, many believe that the government should preserve less known languages. The reason is that it is possible for these languages have important and useful information to humans. For instance, Sanskrit, one of the languages spoken only by a small group of people in South India, is dramatically disappearing in recent days. This has many typical lessons and notes on how to cure kidney and sinus problems. If this language disappears, these medicinal methods would disappear. So for this reason, many argue that lesser spoken languages should be preserved at any cost.
To sum up, arguments whether to invest money or not to protect less popular languages have strong support. In my opinion, governments have to find a viable way to protect all languages by investing less money. Let us hope that people, in the future, would enjoy all different languages which are useful to mankind.