Any "Helppp" on the speed and readability of handwritting
Posted: Thu May 29, 2014 3:34 pm
Hi, y'all
Time spent on typing 30 min but on handwritting 50 min. Oh!
314 Words
Any suggestions,pls ?
Thanks!
here are the topic:
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Modern technology is creating a single world culture.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
I completely agree with the above statement that modern tech helps create a world culture.
How could modern tech like---- say, E-mail or Skype--- not be creating a world culture?
If it is not, what the hell is it?
With the advantage of high tech, communication makes possible everywhere in the word. It does not matter what one’s nationality is, one can talk at great advantages trying to understand each other by using the nature of tech cultural development in hotmail, yahoo, and G-mail.
World culture mean people around the world take for granted of acknowledging what universal cultures are; such as smiling, saying hello, thank you and goodbye, and laughter. And, high-tech people realize these. They create E-mail, a world culture logistics of delivering those caring words and understandings.
Even with two persons based on their inadequacies to have a circle of culture competences—say, one resides in a remote village in Thailand and the other living in Alaska---can figure it out E-Mails are ways to contact each other just like smile, a universal language. So, Emails are a by-product culture of modern tech and a world culture of communicating, too.
Think more about this. If one had to make his living as a businessman, I can’t even think of a median culturally effective enough to do his business across boundaries without Emails. These high-tech sort-outs are the measuring standard of the world civilization. It takes a will. It takes the intelligence, no force at all, for a world culture to be created. Emails have got it all.
But after a while, one would gradually know all about the disadvantage of them as well as the master the arts. E-mails are an attainably objective culture, not subjective one, and must be given enough discipline to use them in right ways. Like people who never play respect to other world cultures or even their own cultures, they won’t rise quite high in life except developing a circle of understanding which results partly from what they were born with and partly from what they develop through their lives.
With these guys, modern techs--creating a world culture or not, are useless, though.
Time spent on typing 30 min but on handwritting 50 min. Oh!
314 Words
Any suggestions,pls ?
Thanks!
here are the topic:
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Modern technology is creating a single world culture.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
I completely agree with the above statement that modern tech helps create a world culture.
How could modern tech like---- say, E-mail or Skype--- not be creating a world culture?
If it is not, what the hell is it?
With the advantage of high tech, communication makes possible everywhere in the word. It does not matter what one’s nationality is, one can talk at great advantages trying to understand each other by using the nature of tech cultural development in hotmail, yahoo, and G-mail.
World culture mean people around the world take for granted of acknowledging what universal cultures are; such as smiling, saying hello, thank you and goodbye, and laughter. And, high-tech people realize these. They create E-mail, a world culture logistics of delivering those caring words and understandings.
Even with two persons based on their inadequacies to have a circle of culture competences—say, one resides in a remote village in Thailand and the other living in Alaska---can figure it out E-Mails are ways to contact each other just like smile, a universal language. So, Emails are a by-product culture of modern tech and a world culture of communicating, too.
Think more about this. If one had to make his living as a businessman, I can’t even think of a median culturally effective enough to do his business across boundaries without Emails. These high-tech sort-outs are the measuring standard of the world civilization. It takes a will. It takes the intelligence, no force at all, for a world culture to be created. Emails have got it all.
But after a while, one would gradually know all about the disadvantage of them as well as the master the arts. E-mails are an attainably objective culture, not subjective one, and must be given enough discipline to use them in right ways. Like people who never play respect to other world cultures or even their own cultures, they won’t rise quite high in life except developing a circle of understanding which results partly from what they were born with and partly from what they develop through their lives.
With these guys, modern techs--creating a world culture or not, are useless, though.