task 2 < anyone there?>
Posted: Fri May 30, 2014 6:46 pm
Number of companies that are selling their products worldwide is increasing. Does this phenomenon have more advantages or disadvantages?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Over the last decade, the number of international companies who trade their products worldwide has significantly increased the world over. While some opine that this trend has numerous benefits, others believe that it has significant drawbacks. This essay is an attempt to examine both sides before arriving at a satisfactory outcome.
On the unitary hand, there are many advantages of global companies, and one of them is the availability of different products with a variety of choices and with affordable price. For example, if the number of T-shirt manufacturers in China increases, then there would be a heavy competition among them and, as a result, the buyers from Australia would benefit with various factors such as design, quality and price. Besides this, there will be more employment opportunities globally than any other time. Thus, it is clear that there are some substantial benefits of this increase with worldwide competing manufacturers.
On the other hand, many contend that the primary disadvantage of such drift is the destruction of local factories. For instance, Coco-Cola, a multinational fellowship and a drink maker has been marketing its products in nearly all places around the globe and due to its mass production they offer real inexpensive price for their beverages. With such low prices, many drink manufacturers in India such as Gold Spot has struggled to compete and closed down at the end. So, local factories would be negatively affected by such global increase of industries.
To sum up, there are pros and cons of the companies who market their merchandise all over the world. To my mind, such phenomenon has more benefits than drawbacks because global organisations are benefiting people in several ways.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Over the last decade, the number of international companies who trade their products worldwide has significantly increased the world over. While some opine that this trend has numerous benefits, others believe that it has significant drawbacks. This essay is an attempt to examine both sides before arriving at a satisfactory outcome.
On the unitary hand, there are many advantages of global companies, and one of them is the availability of different products with a variety of choices and with affordable price. For example, if the number of T-shirt manufacturers in China increases, then there would be a heavy competition among them and, as a result, the buyers from Australia would benefit with various factors such as design, quality and price. Besides this, there will be more employment opportunities globally than any other time. Thus, it is clear that there are some substantial benefits of this increase with worldwide competing manufacturers.
On the other hand, many contend that the primary disadvantage of such drift is the destruction of local factories. For instance, Coco-Cola, a multinational fellowship and a drink maker has been marketing its products in nearly all places around the globe and due to its mass production they offer real inexpensive price for their beverages. With such low prices, many drink manufacturers in India such as Gold Spot has struggled to compete and closed down at the end. So, local factories would be negatively affected by such global increase of industries.
To sum up, there are pros and cons of the companies who market their merchandise all over the world. To my mind, such phenomenon has more benefits than drawbacks because global organisations are benefiting people in several ways.
