PLEASE GRADE THIS.. REQUEST GUYS ASAP
Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 1:17 pm
Question) Some people think one should stay all their life in the same job, whereas others advocate changing jobs from time to time. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
People's view about whether to continue in the same job or look for different job opportunity has been a topic of interest for many years.It has been generalised that associating with the same company for a longer period of time has some longer benefits, however in order to progress in the corporate ladder with ability to work in different roles, some people believe that, it is better to accept challenging roles time to time. I, personally believe that both the argument have positives
and negatives and with regards to it, this essay will analyse the both sides and will end in conclusion.
To begin with, often older age group people are the segments who are seen working in the organisation for a long period of time.For them, security and long term stability acts as a important tool to be successful in corporate life.They are less adaptable to changes and needs a longer time to be a part of the organisational team. For example, government offices in India covers majority of old aged persons who are working for more than 10 years towards the upliftment of the organisation. This results in organisation becoming dependent on them. No matter this can be a advantage for short term but on a longer term it is a big disadvantage for the organisation which gets low resistant towards business expansion.Adding to it, from the personality development side, these people are less competitive as compared to younger group who are risk takers.
Furthermore, other side of the argument is also true, as with the advent of globalisation, people are changing their work from time to time in order to fit themselves in different social and corporate settings. This segment cover the younger demographics who are analytical, logical and often wants to associate themselves in handing different projects. This results in making them overall competitive in the corporate market. Younger crowd often have the urge to learn and
have the capability of attention to detail which makes them developing a negotiation attitude. For instance, a market research survey by Roy Morgan pointed that, around 80% of the Australian young crowd develops skills in their first job and after gaining they use those skills in the next job. This results, in enhancing their personality and level of knowledge.
Therefore, it is clear that, people's view of whether to continue in the same job or change depends upon the age group and the behavioural characteristics. It is true that, old segments often choose to stay in the same job as they are resistant to changes whereas younger market have the skills and behavioural traits which makes them competitive overall. It is recommended that, older group should cooperate with younger market by getting themselves knowledgeable with the recent
skills and development.
PLEASE COMMENT ON THIS GUYS ASAP
THANKS
ARGHO
People's view about whether to continue in the same job or look for different job opportunity has been a topic of interest for many years.It has been generalised that associating with the same company for a longer period of time has some longer benefits, however in order to progress in the corporate ladder with ability to work in different roles, some people believe that, it is better to accept challenging roles time to time. I, personally believe that both the argument have positives
and negatives and with regards to it, this essay will analyse the both sides and will end in conclusion.
To begin with, often older age group people are the segments who are seen working in the organisation for a long period of time.For them, security and long term stability acts as a important tool to be successful in corporate life.They are less adaptable to changes and needs a longer time to be a part of the organisational team. For example, government offices in India covers majority of old aged persons who are working for more than 10 years towards the upliftment of the organisation. This results in organisation becoming dependent on them. No matter this can be a advantage for short term but on a longer term it is a big disadvantage for the organisation which gets low resistant towards business expansion.Adding to it, from the personality development side, these people are less competitive as compared to younger group who are risk takers.
Furthermore, other side of the argument is also true, as with the advent of globalisation, people are changing their work from time to time in order to fit themselves in different social and corporate settings. This segment cover the younger demographics who are analytical, logical and often wants to associate themselves in handing different projects. This results in making them overall competitive in the corporate market. Younger crowd often have the urge to learn and
have the capability of attention to detail which makes them developing a negotiation attitude. For instance, a market research survey by Roy Morgan pointed that, around 80% of the Australian young crowd develops skills in their first job and after gaining they use those skills in the next job. This results, in enhancing their personality and level of knowledge.
Therefore, it is clear that, people's view of whether to continue in the same job or change depends upon the age group and the behavioural characteristics. It is true that, old segments often choose to stay in the same job as they are resistant to changes whereas younger market have the skills and behavioural traits which makes them competitive overall. It is recommended that, older group should cooperate with younger market by getting themselves knowledgeable with the recent
skills and development.
PLEASE COMMENT ON THIS GUYS ASAP
THANKS
ARGHO