Please comment on my task 2 essay and give me feedback
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2014 11:29 pm
TOPIC:
Advertisements of toys and snacks will have negative influence on kids as well as their family, so the government should restrict those publications on media. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
ANSWER:
With the advent of technology, the multimedia plays a pivotal role in daily life. But at the same time, more people start to concern the negative impacts of too much toy and snack advertisements on kids. To my way of thinking, it is a smart idea to establish a set of strict publication policies.
Admittedly, advertisement of any kinds could promote the various products and stimulate the local consumption. Also advertisement of toys and snacks would provide information to those parents on how to occupy or calm down their kids with latest products. However, we could now overlook the negative effects created by too much advertisements promoting on such products.
To be more precise, too much exposure to those toys and snacks would mislead the kids because of, to a large degree, their natural curiosity and immaturity. Those attractive advertisements on snacks would compel young children losing their interests and habits in daily food consumption, which is the source of nutrition and energy. Thus it would be linked to healthy problems such as obesity. Same to those toys promotion might cause that children neglect and distract the pursuit of academic knowledge.
On the other hand, the compelling advertisements would encourage the children and their family to buy in bulk, which put a heavy burden on the shoulders of low-income families. Statistics has revealed that expense on toys in families with kids would take up to 10% of their daily cost; what is worse, most of the toys are only played twice or less, which is a great waste of resources.
In conclusion, the widespread of advertisements on toys and snacks indeed generated quite a few negative impacts on young kids, which calls on the government to take the initiatives to put on more strict policies regulating its publication and exposure to those immature children.
Advertisements of toys and snacks will have negative influence on kids as well as their family, so the government should restrict those publications on media. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
ANSWER:
With the advent of technology, the multimedia plays a pivotal role in daily life. But at the same time, more people start to concern the negative impacts of too much toy and snack advertisements on kids. To my way of thinking, it is a smart idea to establish a set of strict publication policies.
Admittedly, advertisement of any kinds could promote the various products and stimulate the local consumption. Also advertisement of toys and snacks would provide information to those parents on how to occupy or calm down their kids with latest products. However, we could now overlook the negative effects created by too much advertisements promoting on such products.
To be more precise, too much exposure to those toys and snacks would mislead the kids because of, to a large degree, their natural curiosity and immaturity. Those attractive advertisements on snacks would compel young children losing their interests and habits in daily food consumption, which is the source of nutrition and energy. Thus it would be linked to healthy problems such as obesity. Same to those toys promotion might cause that children neglect and distract the pursuit of academic knowledge.
On the other hand, the compelling advertisements would encourage the children and their family to buy in bulk, which put a heavy burden on the shoulders of low-income families. Statistics has revealed that expense on toys in families with kids would take up to 10% of their daily cost; what is worse, most of the toys are only played twice or less, which is a great waste of resources.
In conclusion, the widespread of advertisements on toys and snacks indeed generated quite a few negative impacts on young kids, which calls on the government to take the initiatives to put on more strict policies regulating its publication and exposure to those immature children.
