IELTSNetwork.com

Today, offspring are anticipated to obey the hard guidelines of their parents, while in other societies they are free to do whatever suits them to explore the world. There are enormous advantages of both views. In my view, hard core rules of behavior should not be imposed on the children.
On the one hand, there are remarkable benefits of strict parental guidance to their young children. It has been said that the strict rules of behavior makes the children more responsible and more caring towards the culture in which they grow up. These hard means of treating their elders teaches the children to respect them as a social ethic. There are many countries engaged in putting the emphasis on the child behavior in their early age of development. For instance, in Japan, the children are projected to this tuff regulation of behavior in their secondary school as a part of the curriculum. As this shows that this system has greatly benefitted the numerous cultures. Thus, it can be concluded from this example that these hard core policies have enormous advantages.
On the other hand, it is argued that children should not be forced to follow this restricted system of behavior. Nevertheless they should be allowed to do that help them to shape their career. Nowadays, it is generally said that putting much responsibility and strict policy on the young adolescent make them less confident and less competent in problem solving areas. It is extremely important that parents should not put forth tougher set of laws on their children, because in turn it could delay the development of learning new skills. For example, In the U.S.A educational system, children are free to follow what suits them best to achieve their goals. Thus, it is clear that children should be permitted to do what they desire.
In conclusion, it has been shown that both the opinions have its different pros and cones. It is predicted that a balanced course of action should be followed in the foreseeable future.

Children are like clay in a potter's hand and can be moulded into any shape and form. Since the dawn of time, approach towards the upbringing of a child has been a debatable issue. Some cultures believe that strict rules of behaviour will be beneficial for a child's development, while others argue that liberty from these traditional practices will be of more help. In this essay, the advantages of both sides of the discussion will be looked upon and in the end a reasonable conclusion will be derived.

According to the first clan, imposing strict rules on children will nurture them into responsible citizens of the society. For instance, in a country like India, which boasts its cultural heritage, people raise their off springs in a customary manner. The young individuals are taught by their elders, especially the grandparents, about the social mannerisms, which include respect towards each other, addressing elders, proper eating habits and dress codes. As a result of this, today, India emerged as the largest secular country in the world with different religions living in peace and harmony together and Indians are respected globally for their traditions, courtesy and values. Hence, it is clear that strict set of rules are essential for a child's development and the people supporting this side of the debate are genuine in their argument.

On the other hand, many people believe that enforcement of orthodox rules and regulations on children will have a devastating effect on their growth. Take Western countries for example. In many European and American countries, especially the UK and the USA, parents provide freedom and liberty to the budding adults. Undoubtedly, these two countries are the pioneers in the global economy and a home to many advanced and sophisticated products. Therefore, it is understood that a ban of household regulations will transform the children into creative and inquisitive minds in the future. Thus, the camp gravitating towards this point of the discussion has garnered support.

Analysing both sides of the coin, it is felt that the freedom of the younger generation is to be restricted to a certain limit. A proper balance is to be maintained between free parenting and household rules. Only then, societies will be able to produce responsible and successful individuals. After all, today's children are tomorrow's citizens.