Your opinion
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2014 12:42 pm
I would like to present the following topic whether wealthy nations should provide poorer nations with basic amenities including food and shelter or should the government of the poorer nations take actions by themselves.
According to my opinion, I feel that wealthy nations should reach their hands for the poorer nations. In my view, this has many merits. Firstly, a friendly relation is created between different nations, which will have a good outcome on the economy of the poor nation. Additionally, it can improve the standard of living by supplementing surplus amount of food. In this way, diseases spread through physical contamination can be irradicated.This also helps to import commodities into rich nations thereby having a significant impact on trade mutually. In addition, if support is received from a wealthy nation the government of the poorer nation can try utilizing its resources for something beneficial including establishment of a hospital or expanding the current hospital. Various health organizations operating in wealthy nations can organize programs that can later be broadcasted in various forms thereby creating an awareness of the situation worldwide.
I strongly disagree to the fact that the government of the poorer nations should take actions as this can have detrimental effect on the nation. To meet the demands the government starts implementing rules and regulations that may not be welcomed by the citizens. Physical activities like Strikes protest will soon be destroying the nation’s harmony. As a result, the number or crimes and theft may increase due to poverty. In search of a good shelter a flee to the neighboring country may also be seen thereby disturbing the friendly relationship with the neighboring countries.
With these points, I would like to summarize my statement that a wealthy nation supporting the poorer nation is definitely beneficial.
According to my opinion, I feel that wealthy nations should reach their hands for the poorer nations. In my view, this has many merits. Firstly, a friendly relation is created between different nations, which will have a good outcome on the economy of the poor nation. Additionally, it can improve the standard of living by supplementing surplus amount of food. In this way, diseases spread through physical contamination can be irradicated.This also helps to import commodities into rich nations thereby having a significant impact on trade mutually. In addition, if support is received from a wealthy nation the government of the poorer nation can try utilizing its resources for something beneficial including establishment of a hospital or expanding the current hospital. Various health organizations operating in wealthy nations can organize programs that can later be broadcasted in various forms thereby creating an awareness of the situation worldwide.
I strongly disagree to the fact that the government of the poorer nations should take actions as this can have detrimental effect on the nation. To meet the demands the government starts implementing rules and regulations that may not be welcomed by the citizens. Physical activities like Strikes protest will soon be destroying the nation’s harmony. As a result, the number or crimes and theft may increase due to poverty. In search of a good shelter a flee to the neighboring country may also be seen thereby disturbing the friendly relationship with the neighboring countries.
With these points, I would like to summarize my statement that a wealthy nation supporting the poorer nation is definitely beneficial.