Please assess my writing
Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2015 10:35 am
Some people think that the government should fund music, dance and arts lessons for children. Others think that they should be funded by private businesses or by children’s families. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Since the beginning of recorded time, there is a debate on subjects that are taught in schools. This can be seen nowhere clear than many schools have strict curriculum for their pupils. Many argue that government should found on art subjects for children, however, this is refuted by others. These argument will be analyzed prior to coming to a reasoned conclusion.
Historically, many people have supporting the idea that all kind of art lessons are vitally important as they develop creativity of pupils. Take famous Da Vinci as example. He was famous because of his painting and his invention as well. If he had not experience in painting, he never could draw the first blue print of airplane. This example shows clearly that art has significant impact on students as well arithmetic subjects so it is a worthwhile subject that governments should found it. It is easy to see why this argument has garnered a lot of support.
It is felt by many that music and other kind of art are amusement topics and students should focus on lessons that prepare them for their future career.. For example, accept in entrance university exam in my country requires considerable effort. So student spend all school years to study hard for this exam and it is believed spend time on art just wasting their valuable time. It is goes without saying that in some circumstances music, dance and other type of art should be considered as leisure activity that should receive support from private organizations.
After analyzing these two point of view it is felt that nowadays needs for learning art lessons is reduced and it is count as unnecessary lesson among all tough subjects like math and physic. without a doubt, we cannot eliminate are from our live and it is better as individual spend some money to learn it.
Since the beginning of recorded time, there is a debate on subjects that are taught in schools. This can be seen nowhere clear than many schools have strict curriculum for their pupils. Many argue that government should found on art subjects for children, however, this is refuted by others. These argument will be analyzed prior to coming to a reasoned conclusion.
Historically, many people have supporting the idea that all kind of art lessons are vitally important as they develop creativity of pupils. Take famous Da Vinci as example. He was famous because of his painting and his invention as well. If he had not experience in painting, he never could draw the first blue print of airplane. This example shows clearly that art has significant impact on students as well arithmetic subjects so it is a worthwhile subject that governments should found it. It is easy to see why this argument has garnered a lot of support.
It is felt by many that music and other kind of art are amusement topics and students should focus on lessons that prepare them for their future career.. For example, accept in entrance university exam in my country requires considerable effort. So student spend all school years to study hard for this exam and it is believed spend time on art just wasting their valuable time. It is goes without saying that in some circumstances music, dance and other type of art should be considered as leisure activity that should receive support from private organizations.
After analyzing these two point of view it is felt that nowadays needs for learning art lessons is reduced and it is count as unnecessary lesson among all tough subjects like math and physic. without a doubt, we cannot eliminate are from our live and it is better as individual spend some money to learn it.