IELTSNetwork.com

Posted: **Sat Mar 15, 2014 8:34 am**

I've left a few spaces in the essay below. Suggest a word (or words) that you feel could complete each space. I'll share the words from the original essay on Monday.

Scientists predict that future generations will be able to live well past 100 years. Some people believe this is a good thing while others believe this development will bring about serious problems for the planet. Discuss both of these views and share your opinion.

Extending human life has fascinated humankind for many millennia. This enthusiasm is today becoming ________, as modern technology continues to make tangible improvements in its ability to postpone death. This essay will look at both the benefits and drawbacks of extending human life past 100 years.

Firstly, the benefits humanity derives through prolonging human life are obvious. By extending the average human lifespan beyond 100 years, a person would be able to accomplish far more in a lifetime than at any other point in human evolution. Inventive and creative minds would ________ for decades longer than their predecessors, while others could be given the opportunity to enjoy experiences they may not have had without such advancements. Thus, it is clear that the lengthening of lifespans has several positive facets.

On the other hand, extending human life could take a significant toll on the environment and possibly lead to conflict. For instance, if humans were dying in fewer and fewer numbers, the Earth’s population would likely increase to the point where the resources needed to sustain all individuals were unavailable. This ________ could have tremendous consequences on global security, as violent conflict over dwindling resources would likely arise among competing groups and nations. The significant drawbacks to the delaying of death therefore can be seen.

In conclusion, while prolonging human life dramatically is a medical accomplishment that could lead to positive outcomes, the consequences of such developments may be dangerous and do more harm than good. Thus, movements towards extending human life well past 100 years should be carefully balanced with their ________.

Posted: **Sat Mar 15, 2014 10:56 am**

Scientists predict that future generations will be able to live well past 100 years. Some people believe this is a good thing while others believe this development will bring about serious problems for the planet. Discuss both of these views and share your opinion.

Extending human life has fascinated humankind for many millennia. This enthusiasm is today becoming more popular, as modern technology continues to make tangible improvements in its ability to postpone death. This essay will look at both the benefits and drawbacks of extending human life past 100 years.

Firstly, the benefits humanity derives through prolonging human life are obvious. By extending the average human lifespan beyond 100 years, a person would be able to accomplish far more in a lifetime than at any other point in human evolution. Inventive and creative minds would last for decades longer than their predecessors, while others could be given the opportunity to enjoy experiences they may not have had without such advancements. Thus, it is clear that the lengthening of lifespans has several positive facets.

On the other hand, extending human life could take a significant toll on the environment and possibly lead to conflict. For instance, if humans were dying in fewer and fewer numbers, the Earth's population would likely increase to the point where the resources needed to sustain all individuals were unavailable. This tendency could have tremendous consequences on global security, as violent conflict over dwindling resources would likely arise among competing groups and nations. The significant drawbacks to the delaying of death therefore can be seen.

In conclusion, while prolonging human life dramatically is a medical accomplishment that could lead to positive outcomes, the consequences of such developments may be dangerous and do more harm than good. Thus, movements towards extending human life well past 100 years should be carefully balanced with their aftermath.

Posted: **Sat Mar 15, 2014 1:57 pm**

This enthusiasm is today becoming [prevalent], as modern technology continues to make tangible improvements in its ability to postpone death

Inventive and creative minds would [survive] for decades longer than their predecessors

This [perception]could have tremendous consequences on global security, as violent conflict over dwindling resources would likely arise among competing groups and nations.

Thus, movements towards extending human life well past 100 years should be carefully balanced with their [drawbacks]

Posted: **Sat Mar 15, 2014 2:09 pm**

Extending human life has fascinated humankind for many millennia. This enthusiasm is today becoming [reality], as modern technology continues to make tangible improvements in its ability to postpone death. This essay will look at both the benefits and drawbacks of extending human life past 100 years.

Firstly, the benefits humanity derives through prolonging human life are obvious. By extending the average human lifespan beyond 100 years, a person would be able to accomplish far more in a lifetime than at any other point in human evolution. Inventive and creative minds would [thrive] for decades longer than their predecessors, while others could be given the opportunity to enjoy experiences they may not have had without such advancements. Thus, it is clear that the lengthening of lifespans has several positive facets.

On the other hand, extending human life could take a significant toll on the environment and possibly lead to conflict. For instance, if humans were dying in fewer and fewer numbers, the Earth’s population would likely increase to the point where the resources needed to sustain all individuals were unavailable. This [possibility] could have tremendous consequences on global security, as violent conflict over dwindling resources would likely arise among competing groups and nations. The significant drawbacks to the delaying of death therefore can be seen.

In conclusion, while prolonging human life dramatically is a medical accomplishment that could lead to positive outcomes, the consequences of such developments may be dangerous and do more harm than good. Thus, movements towards extending human life well past 100 years should be carefully balanced with their [repercussions].

Posted: **Sat Mar 15, 2014 3:02 pm**

Scientists predict that future generations will be able to live well past 100 years. Some people believe this is a good thing while others believe this development will bring about serious problems for the planet. Discuss both of these views and share your opinion.

Extending human life has fascinated humankind for many millennia. This enthusiasm is today becoming possibility, as modern technology continues to make tangible improvements in its ability to postpone death. This essay will look at both the benefits and drawbacks of extending human life past 100 years.

Firstly, the benefits humanity derives through prolonging human life are obvious. By extending the average human lifespan beyond 100 years, a person would be able to accomplish far more in a lifetime than at any other point in human evolution. Inventive and creative minds would endure for decades longer than their predecessors, while others could be given the opportunity to enjoy experiences they may not have had without such advancements. Thus, it is clear that the lengthening of lifespans has several positive facets.

On the other hand, extending human life could take a significant toll on the environment and possibly lead to conflict. For instance, if humans were dying in fewer and fewer numbers, the Earth’s population would likely increase to the point where the resources needed to sustain all individuals were unavailable. This nostrum could have tremendous consequences on global security, as violent conflict over dwindling resources would likely arise among competing groups and nations. The significant drawbacks to the delaying of death therefore can be seen.

In conclusion, while prolonging human life dramatically is a medical accomplishment that could lead to positive outcomes, the consequences of such developments may be dangerous and do more harm than good. Thus, movements towards extending human life well past 100 years should be carefully balanced with their pitfalls.

Posted: **Sat Mar 15, 2014 4:57 pm**

Extending human life has fascinated humankind for many millennia. This enthusiasm is today becoming more substantial, as modern technology continues to make tangible improvements in its ability to postpone death. This essay will look at both the benefits and drawbacks of extending human life past 100 years.

Firstly, the benefits humanity derives through prolonging human life are obvious. By extending the average human lifespan beyond 100 years, a person would be able to accomplish far more in a lifetime than at any other point in human evolution. Inventive and creative minds would live for decades longer than their predecessors, while others could be given the opportunity to enjoy experiences they may not have had without such advancements. Thus, it is clear that the lengthening of lifespans has several positive facets.

On the other hand, extending human life could take a significant toll on the environment and possibly lead to conflict. For instance, if humans were dying in fewer and fewer numbers, the Earth's population would likely increase to the point where the resources needed to sustain all individuals were unavailable. This phenomenon could have tremendous consequences on global security, as violent conflict over dwindling resources would likely arise among competing groups and nations. The significant drawbacks to the delaying of death therefore can be seen.

In conclusion, while prolonging human life dramatically is a medical accomplishment that could lead to positive outcomes, the consequences of such developments may be dangerous and do more harm than good. Thus, movements towards extending human life well past 100 years should be carefully balanced with their throwbacks.

Posted: **Sat Mar 15, 2014 6:13 pm**

Scientists predict that future generations will be able to live well past 100 years. Some people believe this is a good thing while others believe this development will bring about serious problems for the planet. Discuss both of these views and share your opinion.

Extending human life has fascinated humankind for many millennia. This enthusiasm is today becoming ___prevalent_____, as modern technology continues to make tangible improvements in its ability to postpone death. This essay will look at both the benefits and drawbacks of extending human life past 100 years.

Firstly, the benefits humanity derives through prolonging human life are obvious. By extending the average human lifespan beyond 100 years, a person would be able to accomplish far more in a lifetime than at any other point in human evolution. Inventive and creative minds would ___continue_____ for decades longer than their predecessors, while others could be given the opportunity to enjoy experiences they may not have had without such advancements. Thus, it is clear that the lengthening of lifespans has several positive facets.

On the other hand, extending human life could take a significant toll on the environment and possibly lead to conflict. For instance, if humans were dying in fewer and fewer numbers, the Earth’s population would likely increase to the point where the resources needed to sustain all individuals were unavailable. This _____phenomenon___ could have tremendous consequences on global security, as violent conflict over dwindling resources would likely arise among competing groups and nations. The significant drawbacks to the delaying of death therefore can be seen.

In conclusion, while prolonging human life dramatically is a medical accomplishment that could lead to positive outcomes, the consequences of such developments may be dangerous and do more harm than good. Thus, movements towards extending human life well past 100 years should be carefully balanced with their ___disadvantage____.

Posted: **Sun Mar 16, 2014 6:03 am**

Extending human life has fascinated humankind for many millennia. This enthusiasm is today becoming witness, as modern technology continues to make tangible improvements in its ability to postpone death. This essay will look at both the benefits and drawbacks of extending human life past 100 years.

Firstly, the benefits humanity derives through prolonging human life are obvious. By extending the average human lifespan beyond 100 years, a person would be able to accomplish far more in a lifetime than at any other point in human evolution. Inventive and creative minds would remain for decades longer than their predecessors, while others could be given the opportunity to enjoy experiences they may not have had without such advancements. Thus, it is clear that the lengthening of lifespans has several positive facets.

On the other hand, extending human life could take a significant toll on the environment and possibly lead to conflict. For instance, if humans were dying in fewer and fewer numbers, the Earth’s population would likely increase to the point where the resources needed to sustain all individuals were unavailable. This phenomenon could have tremendous consequences on global security, as violent conflict over dwindling resources would likely arise among competing groups and nations. The significant drawbacks to the delaying of death therefore can be seen.

In conclusion, while prolonging human life dramatically is a medical accomplishment that could lead to positive outcomes, the consequences of such developments may be dangerous and do more harm than good. Thus, movements towards extending human life well past 100 years should be carefully balanced with their negative outcomes.

Posted: **Sun Mar 16, 2014 9:02 am**

Ryan wrote:I've left a few spaces in the essay below. Suggest a word (or words) that you feel could complete each space. I'll share the words from the original essay on Monday.

Scientists predict that future generations will be able to live well past 100 years. Some people believe this is a good thing while others believe this development will bring about serious problems for the planet. Discuss both of these views and share your opinion.

Extending human life has fascinated humankind for many millennia. This enthusiasm is today becoming ____more prevalent____, as modern technology continues to make tangible improvements in its ability to postpone death. This essay will look at both the benefits and drawbacks of extending human life past 100 years.

Firstly, the benefits humanity derives through prolonging human life are obvious. By extending the average human lifespan beyond 100 years, a person would be able to accomplish far more in a lifetime than at any other point in human evolution. Inventive and creative minds would _live_______ for decades longer than their predecessors, while others could be given the opportunity to enjoy experiences they may not have had without such advancements. Thus, it is clear that the lengthening of lifespans has several positive facets.

On the other hand, extending human life could take a significant toll on the environment and possibly lead to conflict. For instance, if humans were dying in fewer and fewer numbers, the Earth’s population would likely increase to the point where the resources needed to sustain all individuals were unavailable. This ___tendency___ could have tremendous consequences on global security, as violent conflict over dwindling resources would likely arise among competing groups and nations. The significant drawbacks to the delaying of death therefore can be seen.

In conclusion, while prolonging human life dramatically is a medical accomplishment that could lead to positive outcomes, the consequences of such developments may be dangerous and do more harm than good. Thus, movements towards extending human life well past 100 years should be carefully balanced with their ____after effects.____.

Posted: **Sun Mar 16, 2014 10:53 am**

Extending human life has fascinated humankind for many millennia. This enthusiasm is today becoming _prominent_______, as modern technology continues to make tangible improvements in its ability to postpone death. This essay will look at both the benefits and drawbacks of extending human life past 100 years.

Firstly, the benefits humanity derives through prolonging human life are obvious. By extending the average human lifespan beyond 100 years, a person would be able to accomplish far more in a lifetime than at any other point in human evolution. Inventive and creative minds would _sustain_______ for decades longer than their predecessors, while others could be given the opportunity to enjoy experiences they may not have had without such advancements. Thus, it is clear that the lengthening of lifespan has several positive facets.

On the other hand, extending human life could take a significant toll on the environment and possibly lead to conflict. For instance, if humans were dying in fewer and fewer numbers, the Earth’s population would likely increase to the point where the resources needed to sustain all individuals were unavailable. This __implication______ could have tremendous consequences on global security, as violent conflict over dwindling resources would likely arise among competing groups and nations. The significant drawbacks to the delaying of death therefore can be seen.

In conclusion, while prolonging human life dramatically is a medical accomplishment that could lead to positive outcomes, the consequences of such developments may be dangerous and do more harm than good. Thus, movements towards extending human life well past 100 years should be carefully balanced with their __needs______.

Posted: **Sun Mar 16, 2014 2:53 pm**

Scientists predict that future generations will be able to live well past 100 years. Some people believe this is a good thing while others believe this development will bring about serious problems for the planet. Discuss both of these views and share your opinion.

Extending human life has fascinated humankind for many millennia. This enthusiasm is today becoming a reality, as modern technology continues to make tangible improvements in its ability to postpone death. This essay will look at both the benefits and drawbacks of extending human life past 100 years.

Firstly, the benefits humanity derives through prolonging human life are obvious. By extending the average human lifespan beyond 100 years, a person would be able to accomplish far more in a lifetime than at any other point in human evolution. Inventive and creative minds would be fertile for decades longer than their predecessors, while others could be given the opportunity to enjoy experiences they may not have had without such advancements. Thus, it is clear that the lengthening of lifespans has several positive facets.

On the other hand, extending human life could take a significant toll on the environment and possibly lead to conflict. For instance, if humans were dying in fewer and fewer numbers, the Earth's population would likely increase to the point where the resources needed to sustain all individuals were unavailable. This disproportion could have tremendous consequences on global security, as violent conflict over dwindling resources would likely arise among competing groups and nations. The significant drawbacks to the delaying of death therefore can be seen.

In conclusion, while prolonging human life dramatically is a medical accomplishment that could lead to positive outcomes, the consequences of such developments may be dangerous and do more harm than good. Thus, movements towards extending human life well past 100 years should be carefully balanced with their disadvantages.

Posted: **Sun Mar 16, 2014 5:14 pm**

1.prevalent
2.grow
3.increase
4.environment

Posted: **Sun Mar 16, 2014 10:31 pm**

Scientists predict that future generations will be able to live well past 100 years. Some people believe this is a good thing while others believe this development will bring about serious problems for the planet. Discuss both of these views and share your opinion.

Extending human life has fascinated humankind for many millennia. This enthusiasm is today becoming _IMPRESSIVE_______, as modern technology continues to make tangible improvements in its ability to postpone death. This essay will look at both the benefits and drawbacks of extending human life past 100 years.

Firstly, the benefits humanity derives through prolonging human life are obvious. By extending the average human lifespan beyond 100 years, a person would be able to accomplish far more in a lifetime than at any other point in human evolution. Inventive and creative minds would __PROSPER______ for decades longer than their predecessors, while others could be given the opportunity to enjoy experiences they may not have had without such advancements. Thus, it is clear that the lengthening of lifespans has several positive facets.

On the other hand, extending human life could take a significant toll on the environment and possibly lead to conflict. For instance, if humans were dying in fewer and fewer numbers, the Earth’s population would likely increase to the point where the resources needed to sustain all individuals were unavailable. This ___TENDENCY_____ could have tremendous consequences on global security, as violent conflict over dwindling resources would likely arise among competing groups and nations. The significant drawbacks to the delaying of death therefore can be seen.

In conclusion, while prolonging human life dramatically is a medical accomplishment that could lead to positive outcomes, the consequences of such developments may be dangerous and do more harm than good. Thus, movements towards extending human life well past 100 years should be carefully balanced with their __NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES______.

Posted: **Mon Mar 17, 2014 3:52 am**

Scientists predict that future generations will be able to live well past 100 years. Some people believe this is a good thing while others believe this development will bring about serious problems for the planet. Discuss both of these views and share your opinion.
Extending human life has fascinated humankind for many millennia. This enthusiasm is today becoming (a reality) more and more real, as modern technology continues to make tangible improvements in its ability to postpone death. This essay will look at both the benefits and drawbacks of extending human life past 100 years.

On the one hand, (Is ‘firstly’ appropriate here, since you have not mentioned another point?) the benefits humanity derives through prolonging human life are obvious. By extending the average human lifespan beyond 100 years, a person would be able to accomplish far more in a lifetime than at any other point in human evolution. (This would mean that) inventive and creative minds would function for decades longer than their predecessors, while others could be given the opportunity to enjoy experiences they may not have had (Is this the right usage? Or might not have had) without such advancements. (You need to write an example here.) Thus, it is clear that the lengthening of lifespan has several positive facets.

On the other hand, extending human life could take a significant toll on the environment and possibly lead to conflicts. For instance, if humans were dying in fewer and fewer numbers, the Earth’s population would be likely to increase to the point where the resources needed to sustain all individuals were unavailable. This (phenomenon) could have tremendous consequences on global security, as violent conflicts over dwindling resources would be likely to arise among competing groups and nations. The significant drawbacks to the delaying of death therefore can be seen.

In conclusion, while prolonging human life dramatically is a medical accomplishment that could lead to positive outcomes, the consequences of such developments may be dangerous and do more harm than good. Thus, movements towards extending human life well past 100 years should be carefully balanced with their ¬¬¬________.

Posted: **Mon Mar 17, 2014 11:35 am**

Scientists predict that future generations will be able to live well past 100 years. Some people believe this is a good thing while others believe this development will bring about serious problems for the planet. Discuss both of these views and share your opinion.

Extending human life has fascinated humankind for many millennia. This enthusiasm is today becoming REALITY, as modern technology continues to make tangible improvements in its ability to postpone death. This essay will look at both the benefits and drawbacks of extending human life past 100 years.

Firstly, the benefits humanity derives through prolonging human life are obvious. By extending the average human lifespan beyond 100 years, a person would be able to accomplish far more in a lifetime than at any other point in human evolution. Inventive and creative minds would SHINE for decades longer than their predecessors, while others could be given the opportunity to enjoy experiences they may not have had without such advancements. Thus, it is clear that the lengthening of lifespans has several positive facets.

On the other hand, extending human life could take a significant toll on the environment and possibly lead to conflict. For instance, if humans were dying in fewer and fewer numbers, the Earth’s population would likely increase to the point where the resources needed to sustain all individuals were unavailable. This SCENARIO could have tremendous consequences on global security, as violent conflict over dwindling resources would likely arise among competing groups and nations. The significant drawbacks to the delaying of death therefore can be seen.

In conclusion, while prolonging human life dramatically is a medical accomplishment that could lead to positive outcomes, the consequences of such developments may be dangerous and do more harm than good. Thus, movements towards extending human life well past 100 years should be carefully balanced with their EXPECTANCIES.

Posted: **Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:34 pm**

The blanks in the essay were originally filled with the following words:

1) This enthusiasm is today becoming reality, as modern technology continues to make tangible improvements in its ability to postpone death.

2) Inventive and creative minds would flourish for decades longer than their predecessors, while others could be given the opportunity to enjoy experiences they may not have had without such advancements.

3) For instance, if humans were dying in fewer and fewer numbers, the Earth’s population would likely increase to the point where the resources needed to sustain all individuals were unavailable. This scenario could have tremendous consequences on global security, as violent conflict over dwindling resources would likely arise among competing groups and nations.

4) Thus, movements towards extending human life well past 100 years should be carefully balanced with their consequences.

-----------

Here is some basic discussion of your suggestions:

1) Words like "prevalent", "prominent", "more prevalent" and "more substantial" work, but they shape the idea a little differently. Instead of putting forth the thought that the technology is catching up to humanity's enthusiasm, these words suggest the enthusiasm is growing as a result of technological advances. A logical link between the essay's first and second sentences is still there, therefore these four suggestions are plausible.

The suggestions that would not work are:
most popular
witness
impressive (grammatically OK, but somewhat illogical)

2) There were several good alternatives offered for this blank:
last
survive
thrive
prosper
function
live (OK, but a little awkward)
grow (OK, but a little awkward)

The suggestions that would not work include:
ensure
continue (continue what?)
remain (remain where? remain doing what?)
sustain
be fertile (grammatically OK but colloquially awkward)
shine (grammatically OK but colloquially awkward)

3) The only suggestions that work are those that refer to the idea presented in the sentence prior:
possibility
phenomenon

No one suggested "situation", which would also fit.

The following do not fit:
tendency
perception
nostrum
implication
disproportion
increase

4) Words that best work here are those that help the sentence become a recommendation for curbing the likelihood of future problems. "Consequences" and "repercussions" are colloquially used to talk about future uncertainties, and therefore fit this blank well.

However, some of the other suggested words do not share these colloquial ties to the future. For example, there is a very slight awkwardness to using a word like "pitfalls" by itself, as the logic behind trying to prevent negative things from happening after they have already occurred is flawed. Thus, "pitfalls" would therefore need to be qualified using a word like "potential" (i.e. "potential pitfalls"). The same is true for words like "drawbacks", "aftermath", "negative outcomes" and "aftereffects".

These words would not fit this blank:
throwbacks
disadvantage or disadvantages
needs
environment
expectancies

I hope that was helpful. Thanks you all for participating.

Posted: **Tue Mar 18, 2014 11:48 am**

1. possibility
2. work
3. situation
4.negative consequences or effects

Posted: **Mon May 26, 2014 4:38 pm**

Extending human life has fascinated humankind for many millennia. This enthusiasm is today becoming apparent, as modern technology continues to make tangible improvements in its ability to postpone death. This essay will look at both the benefits and drawbacks of extending human life past 100 years.

Firstly, the benefits humanity derives through prolonging human life are obvious. By extending the average human lifespan beyond 100 years, a person would be able to accomplish far more in a lifetime than at any other point in human evolution. Inventive and creative minds would exist for decades longer than their predecessors, while others could be given the opportunity to enjoy experiences they may not have had without such advancements. Thus, it is clear that the lengthening of lifespans has several positive facets.

On the other hand, extending human life could take a significant toll on the environment and possibly lead to conflict. For instance, if humans were dying in fewer and fewer numbers, the Earth’s population would likely increase to the point where the resources needed to sustain all individuals were unavailable. This predicament could have tremendous consequences on global security, as violent conflict over dwindling resources would likely arise among competing groups and nations. The significant drawbacks to the delaying of death therefore can be seen.

In conclusion, while prolonging human life dramatically is a medical accomplishment that could lead to positive outcomes, the consequences of such actions may be dangerous and do more harm than good. Thus, movements towards extending human life well past 100 years should be carefully balanced with their consequences.

Posted: **Mon May 26, 2014 5:32 pm**

1) real
2) live
3) change
4) odds

IELTSNetwork.com

Suggest words for this essay: Extending human lifespans

Suggest words for this essay: Extending human lifespans

Re: Suggest words for this essay: Extending human lifespans

Re: Suggest words for this essay: Extending human lifespans

Re: Suggest words for this essay: Extending human lifespans

Re: Suggest words for this essay: Extending human lifespans

Re: Suggest words for this essay: Extending human lifespans

Re: Suggest words for this essay: Extending human lifespans

Re: Suggest words for this essay: Extending human lifespans

Re: Suggest words for this essay: Extending human lifespans

Re: Suggest words for this essay: Extending human lifespans

Re: Suggest words for this essay: Extending human lifespans

Re: Suggest words for this essay: Extending human lifespans

Re: Suggest words for this essay: Extending human lifespans

Re: Suggest words for this essay: Extending human lifespans

Re: Suggest words for this essay: Extending human lifespans

Re: Suggest words for this essay: Extending human lifespans

Re: Suggest words for this essay: Extending human lifespans

Re: Suggest words for this essay: Extending human lifespans

Re: Suggest words for this essay: Extending human lifespans