Hi Ryan can you please check my essay
Posted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 6:19 am
These days in many countries various governments have been increasing retirement age. What do you think increasing this age is good or bad?
Nowadays, there is a different superannuation age in various countries and it is a paradoxical debate that what should be the ideal retirement age. It is argued that government should not increase existing retirement age. This essay will analyse how longevity of service for senior workers limit career opportunities for younger generations and further reduces quality of work.
To begin with, increasing retirement age creates a major hindrance for the younger generations getting suitable jobs, which is not a growth oriented strategy. For example, in India after different states government have increased this age, there are less career options for young skilled workers. Moreover, younger generations are finding it more difficult to get a job due to global recession and lack of experience on their part. Thus, it is clear that increasing retirement age is a major obstacle in newer generations growth, so government should not increase this age.
Furthermore, due to the reduction of physical capacity and various health problems, older worker provides less quality output which is economically less viable. To illustrate this, in Australia due to longer service many employees have been suffering from Occupational Overuse Syndrome (OOS). These health issues and reduction in physical power of older workers are major factors leading to less performance. However, younger employees are more stimulated and physically empowered; hence, they should be provided more chances. So authorities should maintain status quo while reviewing employment terms.
To sum up, above shows that increased retirement age shorten employment chances for young adults and reduces production output. Hence, increasing this limit is not a palpable logic; thus, it is believed that in the foreseeable future more states will maintain the current retirement age for its workers.
Nowadays, there is a different superannuation age in various countries and it is a paradoxical debate that what should be the ideal retirement age. It is argued that government should not increase existing retirement age. This essay will analyse how longevity of service for senior workers limit career opportunities for younger generations and further reduces quality of work.
To begin with, increasing retirement age creates a major hindrance for the younger generations getting suitable jobs, which is not a growth oriented strategy. For example, in India after different states government have increased this age, there are less career options for young skilled workers. Moreover, younger generations are finding it more difficult to get a job due to global recession and lack of experience on their part. Thus, it is clear that increasing retirement age is a major obstacle in newer generations growth, so government should not increase this age.
Furthermore, due to the reduction of physical capacity and various health problems, older worker provides less quality output which is economically less viable. To illustrate this, in Australia due to longer service many employees have been suffering from Occupational Overuse Syndrome (OOS). These health issues and reduction in physical power of older workers are major factors leading to less performance. However, younger employees are more stimulated and physically empowered; hence, they should be provided more chances. So authorities should maintain status quo while reviewing employment terms.
To sum up, above shows that increased retirement age shorten employment chances for young adults and reduces production output. Hence, increasing this limit is not a palpable logic; thus, it is believed that in the foreseeable future more states will maintain the current retirement age for its workers.