for all ielts tutors please assess this, is it band 7 or less

[midokenawi]

Is animal testing necessary? discuss both views and give your opinion

Medical experiments on animals have been very debatable issue in recent time. Many argue that man has the free hand to use animal for food, entertainment and even medical purposes. Although, animal rights groups refute this because testing animal is unethical. This essay will discuss both points of view before drawing a reasoned opinion.
On the one hand, the opponents of animal testing claimed that most of the medical testing laboratories are for cosmetic products such as, skin cream and lipstick. This is considered unmoral because we should not pained living things for unreliable causes. As many researches said that animals suffer from pain and lost like human. Thus, it is clear that testing animal is unethical and should be banned because of inducing pain to them for human accessories.
On the other hand, it is generally accepted that human has the opportunity to exploit anything on the earth to improve his life and of course health improvement is on the top list. First of all, some mammals have very identical organs like human being. For instance, pig’s heart has the same shape and structure of the human’s one. This has provided fantastic chance to generate heart from cell mutation implanted in pigs and then use it in cardiac surgery after full maturation. In addition, governments and the public could not accept to practice medicine on human in the first trial without clear evidence that it is safe on animals. Though, medical progression would be held for unpractical reasons.

In conclusion, animal testing is mandatory for medicine improvement. However, governments and research authorities ought to employ certain rules to prevent animal testing for unnecessary products.

[Flick]

Is animal testing necessary? discuss both views and give your opinion


Medical experiments on animals have become a hotly debated issue in recent time. Many argue that man has the right to use animals for food, entertainment and even medical purposes. However, animal rights groups refute this because testing on animals is unethical. This essay will discuss both points of view before giving a reasoned opinion.

On the one hand, the opponents of animal testing claim that most medical testing laboratories are for cosmetic products, such as skin cream and lipstick. This is considered unmoral because we should not hurt living things for unreliable causes. As many researchers have said, animals suffer from pain and loss like humans. Thus, it is clear that testing on animals is unethical and should be banned.

On the other hand, it is generally accepted that humans have the opportunity to exploit anything on the earth to improve life, and of course health improvement is top of the list. First of all, some mammals have very similar organs to human beings. For instance,a pig’s heart has the same shape and structure as a human heart. This has provided a fantastic chance to generate hearts from cell mutation implanted in pigs and then use them in cardiac surgery after full maturation. In addition, governments and the public could not accept the use of medicine on humans in the first trial without clear evidence that it is safe on animals. Without animal testing, medical progression would be delayed or halted for unpractical reasons.

In conclusion, animal testing is mandatory for medical improvement. However, governments and research authorities ought to employ certain rules to prevent animal testing for unnecessary products.