Please review my Task 2 writing
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 5:44 pm
SOME PEOPLE THINK THAT PARENT SHOULD TEACH CHILDREN HOW TO BE GOOD MEMBER OF SOCIETY.
OTHERS, HOWEVER, BELIEVE THAT SCHOOL IS THE PLACE TO LEARN THIS.
DISCUSS BOTH THESE VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OPINION.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One thing can be termed as common between Children and Tree. We need to nurture both of them for their better growth. As good cultivation, watering can help trees to grow; good care & nurturing can help children grow mentally, emotionally and help them to be a good member of the society. One section of the society feels parents should teach children how to be a good member of the society where another section thinks it is school's duty. These points of view will be discussed in the same order.
A part of Society believes that Parent should hold the duty to teach children to be good member of society. In a way it can be true because children spends their most time of a day with their parents which helps them to bond with their children. Parents know their children's nature very well. These factors can help them to teach children well. However, excess love can spoil a child as well; a possibility which cannot be ruled out. Thus, we can say that the belief is not entirely wrong.
On the other hand, A fraction thinks that the duty lies on the shoulders of Schools. There are many examples to support the claim like Schools have a very disciplined and controlled environment which can help school teachers to impart good habits in children. The training given to teachers to guide children in a gentle way can play a great role in the mission to groom the children. Saying all of the above, The schools also have some limitations like they cannot focus on an individual child as compared to parents. By analysing these facts, It is clear why some support this claim.
For reasons related the matter of teaching children to be a good member of society by Parents or bye School are supported and refuted by many. However, after analysing both the points, It is evident that grooming the children is a collective effort. It looks impossible imagine parents mentor the children without the help of school and visa versa. Thus, Both arguments are supported and refuted at the same time.
OTHERS, HOWEVER, BELIEVE THAT SCHOOL IS THE PLACE TO LEARN THIS.
DISCUSS BOTH THESE VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OPINION.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One thing can be termed as common between Children and Tree. We need to nurture both of them for their better growth. As good cultivation, watering can help trees to grow; good care & nurturing can help children grow mentally, emotionally and help them to be a good member of the society. One section of the society feels parents should teach children how to be a good member of the society where another section thinks it is school's duty. These points of view will be discussed in the same order.
A part of Society believes that Parent should hold the duty to teach children to be good member of society. In a way it can be true because children spends their most time of a day with their parents which helps them to bond with their children. Parents know their children's nature very well. These factors can help them to teach children well. However, excess love can spoil a child as well; a possibility which cannot be ruled out. Thus, we can say that the belief is not entirely wrong.
On the other hand, A fraction thinks that the duty lies on the shoulders of Schools. There are many examples to support the claim like Schools have a very disciplined and controlled environment which can help school teachers to impart good habits in children. The training given to teachers to guide children in a gentle way can play a great role in the mission to groom the children. Saying all of the above, The schools also have some limitations like they cannot focus on an individual child as compared to parents. By analysing these facts, It is clear why some support this claim.
For reasons related the matter of teaching children to be a good member of society by Parents or bye School are supported and refuted by many. However, after analysing both the points, It is evident that grooming the children is a collective effort. It looks impossible imagine parents mentor the children without the help of school and visa versa. Thus, Both arguments are supported and refuted at the same time.